Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
decrease crash » increased crash (Expand Search), decreased across (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
decrease crash » increased crash (Expand Search), decreased across (Expand Search)
-
61
-
62
Predictor importance for predicting stock market using neural network and linear predictor.
Published 2022Subjects: -
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
Scheme of g-λ model with larger values λ.
Published 2024“…The findings suggest that when λ is respectively equal to 4.19, 8.57, 10, and 12.15, the peak particle velocity (PPV) of the transmitted waves is significantly close to the incident wave amplitude. Furthermore, when λ is fixed, the energy transmission coefficient increases with the incident wave amplitude but decreases with the incident wave frequency. …”
-
69
Gallbladder fossa parameters in livers with gallbladders, segregated by sex.
Published 2021Subjects: -
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
Comparison of gallbladder fossa parameters in livers from cadavers with and without gallbladders.
Published 2021Subjects: -
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
80