Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance levels » significance level (Expand Search)
Showing 1 - 20 results of 207 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significance levels) OR (significant gap)) decrease ))~', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Distribution of responses to vital signs. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  5. 5

    Survey tool development process. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  6. 6

    Respondent characteristics. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  7. 7

    S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  8. 8

    Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  9. 9

    S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  10. 10

    Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  11. 11

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  12. 12

    Participant enrollment. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  13. 13

    S1 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  14. 14

    Change in STAI scores after counseling. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  15. 15

    S1 Protocol - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  16. 16
  17. 17

    High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer by José A. S. Laranjeira (18870824)

    Published 2024
    “…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
  18. 18

    High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer by José A. S. Laranjeira (18870824)

    Published 2024
    “…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
  19. 19
  20. 20