Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance testing » significance set (Expand Search)
significance test » significance set (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search), significance _ (Expand Search)
Showing 1,001 - 1,020 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significance test) OR (significance testing)) decrease ))', query time: 0.49s Refine Results
  1. 1001
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 1002
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. B1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 1003
    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A.

    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 1004
    Identification of the most important and least important criterion using the SD method ‐ all combinations.

    Identification of the most important and least important criterion using the SD method ‐ all combinations. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 1005
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 1006
    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1.

    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 1007
    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 1008
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 1009
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 1010
    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5.

    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 1011
    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts).

    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts). by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 1012
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 1013
    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.

    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 1014
    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10.

    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 1015
    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 1016
    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique.

    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 1017
    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1.

    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 1018
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 1019
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 1020
    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: