Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant adverse » significant advantage (Expand Search)
significant based » significant cause (Expand Search), significant barrier (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
-
1
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Tested levels of fertilization, microbiological preparations and forecrop under drought stress.
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Four grid table.
Published 2025“…This study aims to evaluate the AEs associated with finasteride use, based on data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), to contribute to its safety assessment.…”
-
18
Four major algorithms used for signal detection.
Published 2025“…This study aims to evaluate the AEs associated with finasteride use, based on data from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), to contribute to its safety assessment.…”
-
19
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
20
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”