Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
significant anti » significant health (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant factor » significant factors (Expand Search)
significant anti » significant health (Expand Search), significant change (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
-
1861
-
1862
-
1863
-
1864
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1865
-
1866
-
1867
-
1868
-
1869
-
1870
Differential expression of acute rejection markers between C1 and C2 clusters.
Published 2024Subjects: -
1871
-
1872
-
1873
-
1874
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1875
-
1876
Image1_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.tif
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>The EC group had significantly lower WFS1 expression, with an AUC of 0.857 for the ROC diagnostic curve. …”
-
1877
Table2_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.xlsx
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>The EC group had significantly lower WFS1 expression, with an AUC of 0.857 for the ROC diagnostic curve. …”
-
1878
Table3_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.docx
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>The EC group had significantly lower WFS1 expression, with an AUC of 0.857 for the ROC diagnostic curve. …”
-
1879
Table1_The immunological and prognostic significance of the diabetes mellitus-related gene WFS1 in endometrial cancer.xlsx
Published 2024“…</p>Results<p>The EC group had significantly lower WFS1 expression, with an AUC of 0.857 for the ROC diagnostic curve. …”
-
1880
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”