Showing 1 - 20 results of 165 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significant based) OR (significant gap)) decrease ))~', query time: 0.46s Refine Results
  1. 1

    S8 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  2. 2

    Study populations of included studies. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  3. 3

    Future research directions. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  4. 4

    PRISMA flow diagram. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  5. 5

    S9 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  6. 6

    S7 File - by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  7. 7

    Participant characteristics of included studies. by Martha R. Smith (20410184)

    Published 2024
    “…Five of the 11 studies that evaluated hepatic steatosis reported an absolute decrease of 1% to 3%. In the nine studies that evaluated liver chemistry, no significant changes were observed.…”
  8. 8

    Distribution of responses to vital signs. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  9. 9

    Survey tool development process. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  10. 10

    Respondent characteristics. by Lisa Thiele (6468056)

    Published 2025
    “…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
  11. 11

    S2 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  12. 12

    Outcomes and interventions by group comparison. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  13. 13

    S1 Fig.pdf - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  14. 14

    Baseline characteristics of participants. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  15. 15

    Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  16. 16

    Participant enrollment. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  17. 17

    S1 Appendix - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  18. 18

    Change in STAI scores after counseling. by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  19. 19

    S1 Protocol - by Shaaista Budhani (21030221)

    Published 2025
    “…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
  20. 20

    <b>Nest mass in forest tits </b><b><i>Paridae</i></b><b> </b><b>increases with elevation and decreasing body mass, promoting reproductive success</b> by Clara Wild (19246606)

    Published 2025
    “…We found that nest mass increased by ~ 60% along the elevational gradient, but the effect of canopy openness on nest mass was not significant, while nest mass decreased along the ranked species from the smallest <i>Periparus ater</i> to the medium-sized <i>Cyanistes caeruleus</i> and the largest <i>Parus major</i>. …”