Showing 1 - 20 results of 284 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significant causal) OR (significant i)) decrease ))~', query time: 0.47s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

    Causal relationships between allergic diseases and significant declines in lung function: a multivariable Mendelian randomization study by Jiannan Lin (6954983)

    Published 2025
    “…However, in multivariable MR analysis, the independent effects of atopic dermatitis and allergic conjunctivitis on lung function were no longer significant. Only allergic asthma continued to show a significant causal relationship with decreased lung function (OR [95%CI]: 1.019 [1.008–1.030], <i>p</i> < .001).…”
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Heterogeneity analysis. by Ying Zhao (16546)

    Published 2025
    “…Instrumental variables (IVs) were identified as genome-wide significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a significance threshold of <i>P </i>< 1 × 10<sup>−8</sup> and an independence criterion of <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> < 0.001. …”
  9. 9

    Reverse MR analysis data. by Ying Zhao (16546)

    Published 2025
    “…Instrumental variables (IVs) were identified as genome-wide significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a significance threshold of <i>P </i>< 1 × 10<sup>−8</sup> and an independence criterion of <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> < 0.001. …”
  10. 10

    SNP dressing by screening. by Ying Zhao (16546)

    Published 2025
    “…Instrumental variables (IVs) were identified as genome-wide significant single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with a significance threshold of <i>P </i>< 1 × 10<sup>−8</sup> and an independence criterion of <i>r</i><sup>2</sup> < 0.001. …”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14

    Flowchart of literature screening process. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

    Published 2025
    “…Interestingly, a potential causal relationship between hydroxychloroquine use and lower infection risk was observed in the cohort studies subgroup (OR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.04), but not in the case-control studies subgroup (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p = 0.83). …”
  15. 15

    Basic characteristics of included literature. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

    Published 2025
    “…Interestingly, a potential causal relationship between hydroxychloroquine use and lower infection risk was observed in the cohort studies subgroup (OR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.04), but not in the case-control studies subgroup (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p = 0.83). …”
  16. 16

    Raw data. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

    Published 2025
    “…Interestingly, a potential causal relationship between hydroxychloroquine use and lower infection risk was observed in the cohort studies subgroup (OR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.04), but not in the case-control studies subgroup (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p = 0.83). …”
  17. 17

    Forest plot of overall analysis results. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

    Published 2025
    “…Interestingly, a potential causal relationship between hydroxychloroquine use and lower infection risk was observed in the cohort studies subgroup (OR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.04), but not in the case-control studies subgroup (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p = 0.83). …”
  18. 18

    Forest plot for subgroups of infection types. by Shangtian Wang (20933822)

    Published 2025
    “…Interestingly, a potential causal relationship between hydroxychloroquine use and lower infection risk was observed in the cohort studies subgroup (OR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.44-0.99, p = 0.04), but not in the case-control studies subgroup (OR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.63-1.79, p = 0.83). …”
  19. 19

    Details of the GWAS data in this study. by Jing Wang (6206297)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>This study shows that increases of anti-H. pylori IgG seropositivity was significantly associated with an increased risk of CHD (OR=1.003, 95% CI:1.0001.006, P = 0.048) and increases in peak insulin response (β = 0.214, 95% CI: 0.025–0.403, P = 0.026), decrease in total free cholesterol levels (β = ‒0.031, 95% CI: ‒0.061 to ‒0.000, P = 0.045), decreased waist circumference (β = ‒0.073, 95% CI: ‒0.138 to ‒0.008, P = 0.027) and waist-to-hip ratio (β = ‒0.069, 95% CI: ‒0.136 to ‒0.002, P = 0.044). …”
  20. 20