Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant co » significant _ (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant co » significant _ (Expand Search), significant factor (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
-
1821
-
1822
-
1823
-
1824
-
1825
-
1826
-
1827
-
1828
-
1829
-
1830
-
1831
-
1832
-
1833
-
1834
-
1835
-
1836
-
1837
Effect of alkali-stress to chlorophyll fluorescence parameters compared to control treatment.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1838
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1839
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1840
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”