Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search), significance levels (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant level » significance level (Expand Search), significance levels (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Distribution of responses to vital signs.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
5
Survey tool development process.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
6
Respondent characteristics.
Published 2025“…A strong negative correlation was present between barriers and confidence. No significant difference existed in knowledge, confidence, or barrier scores based on consumer type, gender, education level, previous experience with deterioration or rapid response team review, or hospitalisation history.…”
-
7
S2 Appendix -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
8
Outcomes and interventions by group comparison.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
9
S1 Fig.pdf -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
10
Baseline characteristics of participants.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
11
Change in Mean Anxiety Scores Over time by group.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
12
Participant enrollment.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
13
S1 Appendix -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
14
Change in STAI scores after counseling.
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
15
S1 Protocol -
Published 2025“…There was a trend of increased recall rates in group 2 for short-term problems, long-term problems, intervention, and incidence rates, but it did not reach statistically significant level. There was an overall decrease in State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) scores of participants after counseling (p = 0.002) but no statistically difference in change of STAI scores between the two groups (p = 0.981).…”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Mean uncertainty of <i>boro</i> rice yields estimated by random forest model from 2002–2021.
Published 2024Subjects: -
20