Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
significant inter » significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant gender » significant concern (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search)
significant inter » significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Data Sheet 1_Clinical predictors and concomitant antiseizure medications effects on seizure control in relation to plasma cenobamate concentration: a multicenter retrospective stud...
Published 2025“…Among responders, 53.8% (14/26) achieved response on ≤100 mg/day, with CNBp of 0.5–17.6 μg/mL (median ∼5–6 μg/mL). There was no significant relationship between age and gender, although there was a statistically significant correlation between CNBp and BMI (p = 0.038; R2 = 0.157). …”
-
3
Data Sheet 2_Profile and risk factors of blood donors who experienced adverse reactions: a cross-sectional study on donor hemovigilance data reported to the national network from 2...
Published 2025“…The Chi-square test was used to analyze risk factors for Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) and inter-group comparisons of VVRs stratified by age (18–22; 23–29; 30–39; 40–49; 50–60), gender (female/male), donation history (first time/repeat), and blood donation volume (200 mL/300 mL/400 mL), type of collection site (fixed site/blood collection shelter/blood collection vehicle/others) and donor source (individual/social group/high school). …”
-
4
Data Sheet 1_Profile and risk factors of blood donors who experienced adverse reactions: a cross-sectional study on donor hemovigilance data reported to the national network from 2...
Published 2025“…The Chi-square test was used to analyze risk factors for Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) and inter-group comparisons of VVRs stratified by age (18–22; 23–29; 30–39; 40–49; 50–60), gender (female/male), donation history (first time/repeat), and blood donation volume (200 mL/300 mL/400 mL), type of collection site (fixed site/blood collection shelter/blood collection vehicle/others) and donor source (individual/social group/high school). …”