Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant 17 » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
significant i » significant _ (Expand Search), significant co (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search)
-
501
-
502
-
503
-
504
-
505
-
506
-
507
-
508
-
509
Open data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant decrease in BMD in the lumbar spine (1.107 ± 0.109 and 1.075 ± 0.112 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), total body (1.135 ± 0.086 and 1.119 ± 0.085 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), and total proximal femur over the six months of EBF compared to the values obtained from the same EBF group at 15 days postpartum (mean percentage decreases in BMD of −3.4 ± 3.7% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in lumbar spine, −2.5 ± 3.4% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in total proximal femur, and −1.7 ± 1.9% (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) in total body). …”
-
510
-
511
-
512
-
513
-
514
-
515
-
516
-
517
-
518
-
519
-
520