Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
significant nn » significant non (Expand Search), significant ns (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
significant nn » significant non (Expand Search), significant ns (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search)
-
1
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
2
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
3
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
4
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
5
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
6
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
7
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
8
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
9
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
10
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
11
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
12
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
13
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
14
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
15
Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces
Published 2025“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”
-
16
Global Land Use Change Impacts on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Environmental Losses
Published 2025“…In contrast, reversing managed to natural ecosystems significantly increased NNM by 20% (9.7, 25.4%) and decreased NN by 89% (−125, −46%), indicating increasing N availability while decreasing potential N loss. …”
-
17
Table 1_Effects of two kinds of vestibular function training on reducing motion sickness in college students.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>After training, both groups’ Graybiel scores, blood pressure, high-frequency power (HF), and root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD) between adjacent normal heartbeats significantly decreased. In the visual-motion cage rotating chair group, in addition to a reduction in the percentage of adjacent normal-to-normal intervals which differed by more than 50 ms (pNN50), as well as decreases in low-frequency power (LF), an increase in LF/HF was observed. …”
-
18
Supplementary file 1_Saltmarsh reclamation enhances plant species richness and reduces soil macrofaunal biomass by regulating soil properties through elevation.docx
Published 2025“…Elevation indirectly increased plant species richness via soil water content (SWC), total carbon (TC), AN, and nitrate nitrogen (NN), but decreased it through bulk density (BD). …”