Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant ns » significant bins (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant dna (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
significant ns » significant bins (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search), significant dna (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
Vertebral cancellous tissueμCT parameters are not significantly affected by aging from 16 to 21 weeks, housing type, or microgravity.
Published 2025“…Data shown are the mean ± standard deviation with a scatter plot (ns: non-significant). (G) μCT volumetric reconstructions of a representative sample from each group show a slight decrease in bone parameters from FL mice, which are not deemed significant by statistical testing.…”
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
Vps34 supports Treg maintenance in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues.
Published 2025“…Two-tailed Student <i>t</i> test (<b>A</b>–<b>D</b>, <b>F</b>–<b>I</b>) or Benjamini–Hochberg test (<b>E</b>); NS, not significant. Data are compiled from 15 (<b>A</b>, <b>F</b>), 12 (<b>B</b>), 5 (<b>C</b>, <b>G</b>, <b>I</b>), 6 (<b>D</b>, lung and liver; <b>H</b>), or 2 (<b>D</b>, colon LP) independent experiments. …”
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
-
40