Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
significant shape » significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant short (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant change » significant changes (Expand Search), significant challenge (Expand Search), significant challenges (Expand Search)
significant shape » significant gap (Expand Search), significant side (Expand Search), significant short (Expand Search)
-
821
Decreased clonogenic capacity of U87MG and U251MG GB cells following treatment with SHG-44 and cis-platin at equal concentrations.
Published 2025“…<b>(D)</b> Similarly, U251MG cells showed significantly decreased clonogenic potential upon 100ΜM SHG-44 treatment when compared to 100ΜM cis-platin and the untreated control. …”
-
822
-
823
-
824
-
825
-
826
-
827
-
828
-
829
-
830
-
831
The figure shows that <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> decreases significantly under control strategies, particularly at temperatures near the peak transmission range, indicating the effectiveness of control mechanisms applied.
Published 2025“…<p>The figure shows that <i>R</i><sub>0</sub> decreases significantly under control strategies, particularly at temperatures near the peak transmission range, indicating the effectiveness of control mechanisms applied.…”
-
832
-
833
Comparison of GHQ-12 total scores pre- and post- guideline change in the mask-wearing behavior.
Published 2025Subjects: -
834
-
835
-
836
-
837
Restricted cubic spline plots showing the association between changes in PAL and risk of CVD.
Published 2025Subjects: -
838
Trend of resistivity changes with increasing water content at different LNAPL contents.
Published 2025Subjects: -
839
-
840
Changes in the hemoglobin.
Published 2025“…The leukocyte and neutrophil counts of the patients in the bone pain group were significantly higher than those of the patients in the no bone pain group, P(WBC) = 0.001, P(ANC) = 0.002.…”