Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
Showing 941 - 960 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significant source) OR (significant burden)) decrease ))*', query time: 0.39s Refine Results
  1. 941
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 942
    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5.

    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 943
    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts).

    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts). by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 944
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 945
    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.

    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 946
    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10.

    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 947
    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 948
    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique.

    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 949
    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1.

    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 950
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 951
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 952
    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 953
    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods.

    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 954
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 955
    Description of results of SD-TOPSIS application (combination A) using selected moment characteristics.

    Description of results of SD-TOPSIS application (combination A) using selected moment characteristics. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 956
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations B1-B5.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations B1-B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 957
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations C1-C10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations C1-C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 958
    A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10.

    A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 959
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 960
    ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5.

    ANOM analysis of evaluated criteria K1–K5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: