Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant source » significant burden (Expand Search)
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant source » significant burden (Expand Search)
significant sex » significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search)
-
761
-
762
-
763
A set of 2 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations D1–D10.
Published 2024Subjects: -
764
-
765
-
766
The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations C1 –C10.
Published 2024Subjects: -
767
The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combination A.
Published 2024Subjects: -
768
-
769
-
770
-
771
-
772
-
773
-
774
-
775
-
776
-
777
Recruitment flow diagram of the current study.
Published 2025“…Phase 1 EQ-VAS decreases were associated with female sex, lower somatic symptom, fewer comorbidities, lack of expectation for a fast recovery, higher ISS, higher injury pain, neck, spine/back or lower extremity injuries. …”
-
778
-
779
Baseline characteristics of mother–infant pairs by child mortality status (N = 11,519).
Published 2025Subjects: -
780
Child mortality rate per 1,000 person-years during the 18-month follow-up period.
Published 2025Subjects: