Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search)
significant trend » significant threats (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant threat » significant effect (Expand Search), significant increase (Expand Search)
significant trend » significant threats (Expand Search), significant burden (Expand Search), significant gender (Expand Search)
-
2021
-
2022
-
2023
-
2024
Mean 0-20 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2025
Mean 0-10 m sprint times for TSG, VBT, and CG groups at pre-test and post-test (with 95% CI).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2026
-
2027
-
2028
Transition probabilities and class sizes for three-step LTA model (N = 432).
Published 2025Subjects: -
2029
Model selection based on best fit.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Malaria remains a significant public health challenge, particularly among vulnerable populations in high-burden countries like Tanzania. …”
-
2030
-
2031
Comparison with Existing Studies.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2032
Specimen Preparation and Experimental Setup.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2033
UCS texts data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) the presence of pores prolongs both the time to failure and the onset of the AE burst stage, with longer durations observed at higher pore dip angles; (2) AE signal amplitude and frequency vary significantly across different loading stages, and the b-value exhibits an “increase–fluctuation–decrease” trend, with the decreasing stage serving as a precursor to rock instability; (3) pore dip angle strongly influences crack propagation types: dip angles of 0°–30° favor axial cracks and through-going wing cracks, 45°–75° angles tend to induce co-planar and wing crack connectivity, while 90° angles cause crack deviation, hindering through-going failure; (4) intact rock fails in a tensile–shear mixed mode, whereas the number of shear cracks in rocks with pores initially increases and then decreases with dip angle, reaching a maximum at 45°, resulting in shear-dominated failure. …”
-
2034
-
2035
-
2036
Mean values (± standard deviation) of CK, CK-MB and LDH before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2037
Mean values (± standard deviation) of liver profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2038
Mean values (± standard deviation) of renal profile parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2039
Mean values (± standard deviation) of hormonal parameters before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2040
Mean values (± standard deviation) of electrolyte concentrations before and after CWI.
Published 2025Subjects: