Showing 1,021 - 1,040 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significant units) OR (significant anti)) decrease ))', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 1021
  2. 1022

    Preference for the EIA – conjoint results. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  3. 1023

    Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  4. 1024

    Sample attribute table. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  5. 1025

    Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  6. 1026

    Sample scenario description. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  7. 1027

    AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  8. 1028

    Methodological flowchart. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  9. 1029

    Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios. by Mehdi Mourali (10170245)

    Published 2025
    “…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
  10. 1030
  11. 1031
  12. 1032
  13. 1033
  14. 1034
  15. 1035
  16. 1036

    UTI diagnoses by sex and physician specialty (2013–2019). by Thomas Hanslmeier (19949694)

    Published 2024
    Subjects: “…fluoroquinolone shares decreased…”
  17. 1037

    Additional file 3 of Single-cell profiling reveals a reduced epithelial defense system, decreased immune responses and the immune regulatory roles of different fibroblast subpopula... by Lin Lin (46073)

    Published 2025
    “…P values were calculated via the two-sided Wilcoxon test. ns, not significant, **, P < 0.01 and ****, P < 0.0001. (G) Feature plot showing LDLR expression levels in C1Q+ macrophages between CAG and control samples.…”
  18. 1038
  19. 1039
  20. 1040

    Data Sheet 1_Secretoneurin plasma levels are decreased after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation—patients with AF produce lower SN levels than healthy individuals: the SAFE r... by Jiří Plášek (21805048)

    Published 2025
    “…Plasma SN levels were significantly lower after the catheter ablation as compared with SN levels before (34.0 ± 15.1 and 40.0 ± 17.3 pmol/L, p = 0.032). …”