Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search), significant benefits (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
Showing 501 - 520 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( ((significant units) OR (significant bias)) decrease ))', query time: 0.40s Refine Results
  1. 501
    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A.

    A set of 5 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation–combination A. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  2. 502
    Identification of the most important and least important criterion using the SD method ‐ all combinations.

    Identification of the most important and least important criterion using the SD method ‐ all combinations. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  3. 503
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations D1 –D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  4. 504
    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1.

    Upper quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B2 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  5. 505
    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of the regressor within the regression model of SD-TOPSIS technique results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  6. 506
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  7. 507
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. D2. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  8. 508
    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5.

    A set of 4 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations B1– B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  9. 509
    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts).

    Territorial-administrative division of the Slovak Republic (districts). by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  10. 510
    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10.

    Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combinations D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  11. 511
    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient.

    Results of correlation analysis using Kendall’s rank correlation coefficient. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  12. 512
    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10.

    A set of 3 criteria for the needs of multi-criteria evaluation ‐ combinations C1–C10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  13. 513
    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of agreement in the order based on the SD-TOPSIS technique across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  14. 514
    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique.

    The principle of operation of the TOPSIS technique. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  15. 515
    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1.

    Lower quartile of district towns evaluated by the SD-TOPSIS technique ‐ combination of A, B1, B1 and C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  16. 516
    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement with tolerance in the order of district towns in the results of SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  17. 517
    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5.

    The importance of entry criteria from the point of view of the SD method ‐ combinations B1 –B5. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  18. 518
    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10.

    Comparison of rank correlation analysis results across groups of combinations - B1-B5 vs. C1-C10 vs. D1-D10. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  19. 519
    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods.

    Comparison of the selected multi-criteria methods. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:
  20. 520
    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1.

    Agreement in the order of district towns in the results of the SD-TOPSIS application in space ‐ combination A vs. C1. by Roman Vavrek (13200141)

    Published 2024
    Subjects:
    Save to List
    Saved in:

Search Tools: