بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
significant gender » significant concern (توسيع البحث), significant burden (توسيع البحث)
significant units » significant anti (توسيع البحث), significant bias (توسيع البحث), significant insights (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
significant gender » significant concern (توسيع البحث), significant burden (توسيع البحث)
significant units » significant anti (توسيع البحث), significant bias (توسيع البحث), significant insights (توسيع البحث)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Demographics by Country and Gender.
منشور في 2025"…Regarding creative self-efficacy, we found gender-specific impacts, with male participants experiencing a decrease, contrary to our expectations. …"
-
4
Exclusion and enrollment summary from NHANES.
منشور في 2025"…Individuals under 30 showed no significant differences. A unit increase below 9.30 in Log2-PMR reduced HCV risk by 0.60-fold. …"
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Study Data.
منشور في 2025"…Regarding creative self-efficacy, we found gender-specific impacts, with male participants experiencing a decrease, contrary to our expectations. …"
-
10
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
11
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
12
Sample attribute table.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
13
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
14
Sample scenario description.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
15
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
16
Methodological flowchart.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
17
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
منشور في 2025"…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …"
-
18
General data comparison.
منشور في 2024"…Comparisons between the two groups in terms of admissions to departments such as otolaryngology, hepatobiliary surgery, hepatic surgery, orthopedics, urology, neurosurgery, gastroenterology surgery, thoracic surgery, ophthalmology and intensive care unit showed no significant differences (P>0.05). …"
-
19
The epidemic period group.
منشور في 2024"…Comparisons between the two groups in terms of admissions to departments such as otolaryngology, hepatobiliary surgery, hepatic surgery, orthopedics, urology, neurosurgery, gastroenterology surgery, thoracic surgery, ophthalmology and intensive care unit showed no significant differences (P>0.05). …"
-
20
Original data.
منشور في 2024"…Comparisons between the two groups in terms of admissions to departments such as otolaryngology, hepatobiliary surgery, hepatic surgery, orthopedics, urology, neurosurgery, gastroenterology surgery, thoracic surgery, ophthalmology and intensive care unit showed no significant differences (P>0.05). …"