Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly change (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
significantly we » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly i (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significantly high » significantly higher (Expand Search), significantly change (Expand Search), significantly less (Expand Search)
significantly we » significantly _ (Expand Search), significantly i (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search)
-
1921
-
1922
-
1923
-
1924
-
1925
(a, b). The statistical error analyses for the models using the same dataset.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1926
The comparison of ν<sub>s</sub> – RHOB trends models with experimental measurements.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1927
-
1928
-
1929
-
1930
-
1931
-
1932
-
1933
Density differences between pre- and post-measurements for program completers (N = 160).
Published 2025Subjects: -
1934
-
1935
-
1936
-
1937
-
1938
Significant inter-relationships between baseline variables and MSCC or MCS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1939
Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average of % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for garbanzo trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”
-
1940