Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
b decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search), ob decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
b decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), b1 decreased (Expand Search), ob decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
19901
Image 3_ZKSCAN3 promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation by increasing HSPB1 expression.pdf
Published 2025“…Through RNA-Seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq, HSPB1 is identified as a target gene of ZKSCAN3. HSPB1 expression is significantly decreased upon suppressing ZKSCAN3 expression. …”
-
19902
Image 1_ZKSCAN3 promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation by increasing HSPB1 expression.pdf
Published 2025“…Through RNA-Seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq, HSPB1 is identified as a target gene of ZKSCAN3. HSPB1 expression is significantly decreased upon suppressing ZKSCAN3 expression. …”
-
19903
Image 2_ZKSCAN3 promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation by increasing HSPB1 expression.pdf
Published 2025“…Through RNA-Seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq, HSPB1 is identified as a target gene of ZKSCAN3. HSPB1 expression is significantly decreased upon suppressing ZKSCAN3 expression. …”
-
19904
Supplementary file 1_ZKSCAN3 promotes ovarian cancer cell proliferation by increasing HSPB1 expression.docx
Published 2025“…Through RNA-Seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq, HSPB1 is identified as a target gene of ZKSCAN3. HSPB1 expression is significantly decreased upon suppressing ZKSCAN3 expression. …”
-
19905
Natural selection diagram.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19906
Improved optimization results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19907
Gene comparison map before and after mutation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19908
Recombinant gene map.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19909
model comparison (Idle/%).
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19910
Comparison chart of use of each node.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19911
Original optimization results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19912
Selection of crossing point.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19913
Operator parameter setting of improved GA.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19914
Product supply sequence diagram.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19915
Crossed offspring chromosomes.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19916
GA iteration graph.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19917
The state of each node after improvement.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19918
The state of each node before improvement.
Published 2025“…Additionally, the variation in node utilization rates significantly decreased from 30.1% to 12.25%, markedly enhancing resource scheduling efficiency and overall balance within the supply chain.…”
-
19919
Image 2_ATG16L1 promotes cell migration and invasion in high glucose–induced retinal capillary endothelial cells.tif
Published 2025“…The migration ability and invasion rate of RCECs were significantly higher in the HG group than in the NG group but decreased markedly after transfection with ATG16L1 siRNA, compared with those in the control group (p < 0.01).…”
-
19920
Image 1_ATG16L1 promotes cell migration and invasion in high glucose–induced retinal capillary endothelial cells.tif
Published 2025“…The migration ability and invasion rate of RCECs were significantly higher in the HG group than in the NG group but decreased markedly after transfection with ATG16L1 siRNA, compared with those in the control group (p < 0.01).…”