Showing 19,681 - 19,700 results of 36,050 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significance ((level decrease) OR (level increased)) ))', query time: 0.57s Refine Results
  1. 19681

    Characteristics of the included studies. by Yehong Zhang (21615640)

    Published 2025
    “…</p><p>Results</p><p>Elevated NT-proBNP levels were significantly linked to increased all-cause (pooled OR = 2.322, 95% CI: 1.718 to 2.925) and cardiovascular mortality (pooled OR = 1.797, 95% CI: 1.161 to 2.433). …”
  2. 19682
  3. 19683

    S1 Dataset - by Abdoulaye Katile (13193175)

    Published 2024
    “…</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study showed the impact of SMC on reducing malaria cases in the population and the significant efforts in LLIN distribution and malaria case diagnosis. …”
  4. 19684

    LSTM model. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  5. 19685

    CNN model. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  6. 19686

    Ceramic bearings. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  7. 19687

    Geometric contact arc length model. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  8. 19688

    Indentation fracture mechanics model. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  9. 19689

    Grinding particle cutting machining model. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  10. 19690

    Three stages of abrasive cutting process. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  11. 19691

    CNN-LSTM action recognition process. by Longfei Gao (698900)

    Published 2025
    “…According to the experimental results, when the grinding depth increases to 21 μm, the average training loss of the model further decreases to 0.03622, and the surface roughness Ra value significantly decreases to 0.1624 μm. …”
  12. 19692
  13. 19693
  14. 19694

    Raw data. by Sura Nashwan (21485672)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, both iMSC- and ADMSC-derived EVs significantly increased HDF viability at 48 and 72 hours (p ≤ 0.01, p ≤ 0.05). …”
  15. 19695

    Overall model framework. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  16. 19696

    Key parameters of LSTM training model. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  17. 19697

    Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  18. 19698

    Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  19. 19699

    The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  20. 19700

    Hybrid Molecules of Benzothiazole and Hydroxamic Acid as Dual-Acting Biofilm Inhibitors with Antibacterial Synergistic Effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections by Zhen-Meng Zhang (20874497)

    Published 2025
    “…Moreover, <b>JH21</b> significantly enhanced the efficacy of tobramycin and ciprofloxacin by 200- and 1000-fold, respectively, in a mouse wound infection model. …”