Estimated average absolute and relative changes in energy (kcal/capita/day) from the no-policy counterfactual by phase and number of excess nutrients of concern. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Weighted sociodemographic characteristics of the Kantar WorldPanel sample by year. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Estimated average absolute and relative changes from the no-policy counterfactual by phase and high-in status. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Mean observed, fitted, and counterfactual energy, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar per capita per day from high-in food and beverage purchases. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Estimated average absolute and relative changes from the no-policy counterfactual by phase and beverage group. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Mean observed, fitted, and counterfactual energy, saturated fat, sodium, and sugar per capita per day from total food and beverage purchases. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

Estimated average absolute and relative changes from the no-policy counterfactual by phase and food group. by Lindsey Smith Taillie (3159258)

Subjects:

The change of disease burden of CRD by sex in Fujian, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

The change of disease burden of CRD by age groups in Fujian, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

The change of disease burden of CRD by categories in Fujian, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

The proportion of attributable risk factors of DALYs of CRD in Fujian, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

The change of attribute risk factors of DALYs in CRD in Fujian, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

The change of disease burden of CRD in different region, 1990-2021. by Yanrong Yin (14292683)

Subjects:

Subgroup analyses for the association of frailty status with risks of Urinary Incontinence by potential mediators. by Xiaohan Gan (22097061)

Subjects:

Characteristics of Study Participants. by Hyelim Lee (11286822)

Subjects:

ERI Thresholds Between Adjacent Zones. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Location of the study area. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Random Forest structure with cross-validation. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Land use change from 1990 to 2020. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”

Geographic data. by Mingyue Sun (4638535)

“…The thresholds of the ERI in the oasis zone-transition zone and the transition zone-desert zone were 0.08–0.085 and 0.111–0.118, respectively. (2) Socioeconomic factors, including infrastructure expansion, population density, and GDP, were dominant influences, contributing 64% to the ERI, whereas the influence of natural factors such as climate declined. (3) The low-ERI areas increased by 3.3% under government control, and the transition zones increased significantly, slowing the growth rate of the oasis zone. …”