Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
p decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
p decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), pa decreased (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1561
-
1562
-
1563
-
1564
-
1565
-
1566
-
1567
-
1568
-
1569
-
1570
-
1571
Each subfigure shows a different local size (LS) and context size (CS) configuration, where the reliability of the model across different initializations is measured in R-squared.
Published 2025“…<p>In most cases where both the local size and context size is small, the DSVAE model is significantly more reliable than the IDSVAE method. …”
-
1572
-
1573
Patient enrollment and inclusion information.
Published 2025“…Patients who had undergone a shunt procedure exhibited a significantly reduced PVS compared to those who had not undergone the procedure. …”
-
1574
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1575
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1576
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1577
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1578
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1579
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”
-
1580
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…For every increase in BMI, there was a decrease in the probability of PTB (OR = 0.923, 95% CI 0.915–0.931, P < 0.001). …”