بدائل البحث:
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
set decrease » step decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث), sizes decrease (توسيع البحث)
significant decrease » significant increase (توسيع البحث), significantly increased (توسيع البحث)
set decrease » step decrease (توسيع البحث), we decrease (توسيع البحث), sizes decrease (توسيع البحث)
-
121
-
122
-
123
-
124
-
125
-
126
Pan-cancer analyses of ACADM expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
127
-
128
Significant gene set results from EGSEA.
منشور في 2024"…<p>The significant gene sets returned by EGSEA analysis of serum-deprived ARPE-19 cell differentially expressed genes. …"
-
129
-
130
-
131
-
132
-
133
-
134
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
منشور في 2024"…The values are expressed as the means ± SDs and were analyzed according to the variance of the factorial design. **, *** and ****denote <i>p</i> < 0.01, < 0.001 and < 0.0001, respectively; ns = not significant.…"
-
135
-
136
-
137
-
138
Pan-cancer analyses of ANGPTL4 expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
139
Pan-cancer analyses of NFKB2 expression and its prognostic significance in the TCGA database.
منشور في 2025الموضوعات: -
140
Sound stress exposure prolonged the period of decreased withdrawal threshold after complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA) injection.
منشور في 2025"…(B) 50% withdrawal threshold in CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress. They showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold on day 7 after CFA injection, and CFA-treated mice exposed to sound stress showed a significant decrease in 50% withdrawal threshold during days 7–21 after CFA injection (CFA, on day 7, ****<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day 0, on day 10, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001 vs day0; CFA + stress, day 7, 10, 14, and 21, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001 vs day 0, Dunnett’s test). …"