Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
step decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
821
-
822
-
823
-
824
-
825
-
826
-
827
-
828
-
829
-
830
-
831
-
832
-
833
-
834
-
835
-
836
Raw data 16–20.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
837
Demographics, SD= Standard Deviation.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
838
Raw data 6–9 and 15.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
839
Raw data 1–5.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
840
Raw data 10–14.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”