Showing 1,701 - 1,720 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significance ((test decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))', query time: 0.59s Refine Results
  1. 1701

    Image 3_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  2. 1702

    Image 1_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  3. 1703

    Image 4_G. vaginalis increases HSV-2 infection by decreasing vaginal barrier integrity and increasing inflammation in vivo.tif by Nuzhat Rahman (16660416)

    Published 2024
    “…</p>Results<p>G. vaginalis inoculated mice infected with HSV-2 had significantly decreased survival rates, increased pathology, and higher viral titers than PBS and L. crispatus inoculated mice. …”
  4. 1704
  5. 1705
  6. 1706
  7. 1707
  8. 1708

    Test plan table. by Xia Li (14984)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, the subsoiling effect was further improved as the working speed decreased and the frequency of air blasts increased, satisfying the subsoiling operation assessment standards. …”
  9. 1709

    Multiple indicator test results. by Jun Zhao (59250)

    Published 2025
    “…The optimization of anisotropic nodes significantly enhances the seismic performance of shear walls. …”
  10. 1710

    NLSs can significantly impact intranuclear stages of HIV-1 infection. by Nicholas Rohlfes (20577485)

    Published 2025
    “…Statistical analysis in A,B,D and F was determined using one-way ANOVA and in E and H using Kruskal-Wallis test. Significant differences are indicated: ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001, **** P<0.0001. …”
  11. 1711
  12. 1712
  13. 1713
  14. 1714
  15. 1715
  16. 1716
  17. 1717
  18. 1718
  19. 1719
  20. 1720