Showing 861 - 880 results of 1,160 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significance ((test decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.37s Refine Results
  1. 861

    RMSE versus learning rate. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  2. 862

    RMSE versus training parameters. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  3. 863

    Assembly process of machine recognition form. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  4. 864

    Process of steel truss incremental launching. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  5. 865

    CGAN and AutoML stacking device. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  6. 866

    Comprehensive prediction process of shape errors. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  7. 867

    Shape error manual calculation process. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  8. 868

    U-wave estimates versus R-matrix noise variance. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  9. 869

    Sliding window process. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  10. 870

    Assembly error angle of a single spline. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  11. 871

    Original record form of error matrix. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  12. 872

    Form for machine recognition. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  13. 873

    RMSE versus architectural parameters. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  14. 874

    Kalman process. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  15. 875

    Attention mechanism. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  16. 876

    Shape error measurement results statistics. by Zhe Hu (787283)

    Published 2025
    “…Then, the LSTM model is trained using this sliding window approach, achieving a root mean square error(RMSE) of 0.03 on the test set. …”
  17. 877
  18. 878
  19. 879

    Bone-related serum chemistry endpoints: Aquamin (180-day treatment group) versus placebo. by Muhammad N. Aslam (6598001)

    Published 2025
    “…A composite score was generated by combining the three individual endpoint scores. Statistical significance between group (composite) values was determined by unpaired t-test; asterisk (*) indicates p < 0.05. …”
  20. 880