Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance greater » significantly greater (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search), significance set (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance greater » significantly greater (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search), significance set (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
-
621
Model calculation diagram.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
622
Grid independence verification.
Published 2025“…When the height is 2.5m and above, the windbreak efficiency is greater than 90%, and the windbreak effect is significantly improved. (2) The change of sand barrier height has a significant effect on the windbreak efficiency between the second and third sand barriers. (3) Among the three sand-blocking fences, when the height of the sand-blocking fence is 2.5m, the thickness of the sand is 50.51% and 58.33% higher than that of the 2m high sand-blocking fence, and the sand-blocking effect is the most significant. …”
-
623
The ACF and PACF of stationarity checking of growth data.
Published 2025“…<p>(Panels a & b) ACF & PACF of weight with 5% significance limit showed stationary pattern as the plots indicating a rapid decline in correlations, weakening ACF associations with greater lags, and significant PACF spikes primarily at the initial lags. …”
-
624
Predicted values from a mixed model of speed of travel during a migratory leg (excluding sub-Saharan movements), with country and season as main effects, including individual bird...
Published 2025“…The interaction term is significant with main difference being the greater decrease in speed between spring and autumn migrations for Nigeria birds.…”
-
625
-
626
-
627
-
628
-
629
Opioid consumption data.
Published 2025“…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
-
630
Prescription data.
Published 2025“…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
-
631
Refill rate by surgical specialty.
Published 2025“…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
-
632
Noncontinuous data on opioid use.
Published 2025“…No significant difference was observed in the mean percentage of prescribed MMEs leftover between the two cohorts (Orthopaedic 47% vs. …”
-
633
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
634
Experimental procedures.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
635
Supplementary file of datasets.
Published 2025“…For ipsilateral erector spinae (ES) to rectus abdominis (RA) ratio, significant time effect (p = 0.022), between-group differences (p = 0.031), and real-time reduction during forward walking in left swing phase, and significant between-group differences (p = 0.024), time-and-group interaction effect (p = 0.009), and real-time increase during backward walking in right swing phase were noted. …”
-
636
-
637
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
638
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
639
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”
-
640
Effect of the Surface Peak–Valley Features on Droplet Impact Dynamics under Leidenfrost Temperature
Published 2024“…Specifically, the Leidenfrost temperature on micropit surfaces increases with greater micropit area occupancy, while it decreases on micropillar surfaces under similar conditions, which is mainly attributed to the differential impact of area occupancy on droplet heat transfer efficiency. …”