Showing 401 - 420 results of 21,342 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significance test decrease ))', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 401
  2. 402
  3. 403
  4. 404
  5. 405
  6. 406
  7. 407
  8. 408
  9. 409
  10. 410
  11. 411
  12. 412
  13. 413
  14. 414

    Tissue, days post-infection (dpi) and the top 10 most significant genes with increased and decreased expression with valid gene symbols for the response contrasts. by Gillian P. McHugo (8965919)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Tissue, days post-infection (dpi) and the top 10 most significant genes with increased and decreased expression with valid gene symbols for the response contrasts.…”
  15. 415

    Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA. by Mieke L. M. Bentvelzen (21594442)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Nineteen SNPs with significant association (<i>P < </i>5 × 10<sup>−8</sup>) with risk on minJSW decrease in knee OA.…”
  16. 416

    Data Sheet 1_Elevated relative humidity significantly decreases cannabinoid concentrations while delaying flowering development in Cannabis sativa L..docx by Ingrid Carolina Corredor-Perilla (22631510)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, high RH significantly suppressed cannabinoid accumulation: cannabidiolic acid (CBD-A), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabichromenic acid (CBC-A) levels decreased by approximately 4.9-fold, 3.2-fold, and 13-fold, respectively. …”
  17. 417
  18. 418
  19. 419
  20. 420

    Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

    Published 2025
    “…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”