Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance test » significance set (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance test » significance set (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
2961
Data Set.
Published 2025“…The results revealed that maladaptive perfectionism significantly mediated the relationship between mindfulness and procrastination -indicating that dispositional mindfulness has a significant indirect effect on procrastination via decreased levels of maladaptive perfectionism. …”
-
2962
Conceptual Framework.
Published 2025“…The results revealed that maladaptive perfectionism significantly mediated the relationship between mindfulness and procrastination -indicating that dispositional mindfulness has a significant indirect effect on procrastination via decreased levels of maladaptive perfectionism. …”
-
2963
MDSC inhibition was correlated with Trp metabolism in 17ZR101-infected lungs.
Published 2025“…(f) Volcano plot analysis of the significantly increased or decreased metabolites. n=6/group. …”
-
2964
Treatment plan of wheat maize composite blends.
Published 2025“…The mineral analysis of various flours showed an increase in the calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium while decrease in zinc contents. The pasting behaviour of wheat maize composite blends showed a significant decrease in their viscosities as the quantity of maize flour increased. …”
-
2965
-
2966
The timeline of the experiment.
Published 2024“…EEG power in the HINS group decreased significantly compared to other experimental groups (p<0.05). …”
-
2967
S1 Raw data -
Published 2024“…EEG power in the HINS group decreased significantly compared to other experimental groups (p<0.05). …”
-
2968
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2024“…EEG power in the HINS group decreased significantly compared to other experimental groups (p<0.05). …”
-
2969
-
2970
The long-term <i>in vitro</i> surrogate bacterial viability of canine and feline FMT products frozen at -80°C for six months.
Published 2025“…<p>All canine FMT products exhibited a significant decrease in overall bacterial viability at the six-month timepoint. …”
-
2971
LNd stimulate LPN to form a circadian feedback circuit.
Published 2024“…Data (D) were quantified with unpaired <i>t</i> test. Data (G, I) were analyzed using Welch’s one-way ANOVA. ns = not significant, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001. …”
-
2972
NPF-NPFR pathway in LNd-LPN feedback circuit fine-tune cooling induced locomotion increase.
Published 2024“…Data (G, J, M, P) were analyzed with Welch’s one-way ANOVA (letters a, b denote significance, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Data (F, I, L, O) were quantified with paired <i>t</i> test. …”
-
2973
Friedman statistic and p-value across iterations.
Published 2025“…A Friedman statistical test was applied to validate the results over five iterations of model training. …”
-
2974
The effect of DC bias on clipping noise variance.
Published 2025“…A Friedman statistical test was applied to validate the results over five iterations of model training. …”
-
2975
Performance of RF regression model.
Published 2025“…A Friedman statistical test was applied to validate the results over five iterations of model training. …”
-
2976
Disruption of OGG1-RNA interaction reduces RSV progeny production.
Published 2024“…Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired Student’s <i>t</i> test, with results shown as means ± SD. Significance levels are indicated as **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001.…”
-
2977
-
2978
Overall model framework.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2979
Key parameters of LSTM training model.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2980
Comparison chart of model evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”