Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance test » significance set (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance test » significance set (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance level (Expand Search)
test decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), cost decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
381
Trends analysis in diabetes mellitus diagnosis according to relative handgrip strength.
Published 2024Subjects: -
382
-
383
-
384
-
385
-
386
-
387
Testing set error.
Published 2025“…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
-
388
-
389
-
390
-
391
-
392
-
393
-
394
-
395
-
396
-
397
-
398
-
399
-
400