Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance testing » significance set (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance testing » significance set (Expand Search)
-
261
Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training.
Published 2025Subjects: -
262
-
263
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
264
-
265
-
266
-
267
-
268
-
269
-
270
Testing set error.
Published 2025“…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
-
271
-
272
-
273
-
274
ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention.
Published 2025“…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
-
275
-
276
-
277
-
278
-
279
-
280