Training-induced changes in bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation between training-related changes in unipedal and bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: Path Length, X Sway Amplitude and Velocity. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of 95% Area, X and Y Amplitude Sway during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Correlations between unipedal and bipedal stance parameters recorded at the beginning of the training and of the control session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Flow diagram. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

The catalase enzyme response of <i>A</i>. <i>albopictus</i> larvae decreased (1.5-fold) in response to <i>M</i>. <i>robertsii</i>-derived copper nanoparticles. by Perumal Vivekanandhan (4863484)

Class-wise performance on the test set. by Muhammad Zubair (728141)

Testing set error. by Xiangjuan Liu (618000)

“…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”

Parameter diagram for the raised parts on the surface of the test specimen (a) Volume (b) Surface area (c) Height (d) Cross-sectional area. by Yang Li (7082)

Subjects:

Parameter diagram for the pit parts on the surface of the test specimen (a) Volume (b) Surface area (c) Depth (d) Cross-sectional area. by Yang Li (7082)

Subjects:

Funnel plot of ICU stay outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.8143). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of AST level outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.4669). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of BUN level outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.9268). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of intubation time outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.0072). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of lactate level outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.3818). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of hospital stay outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.7717). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)

Funnel plot of Creatinine level outcome (Egger test = p-value = 0.1632). by Mohamed R. Abdelraouf (21501468)