Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance testing » significance set (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance testing » significance set (Expand Search)
-
2961
S1 Raw data -
Published 2024“…EEG power in the HINS group decreased significantly compared to other experimental groups (p<0.05). …”
-
2962
S1 Graphical abstract -
Published 2024“…EEG power in the HINS group decreased significantly compared to other experimental groups (p<0.05). …”
-
2963
ELISA kit information.
Published 2025“…<i>PTGFR</i> and <i>JNK</i> mRNA levels, MMP9 and ADH7 protein levels increased significantly in AN-LSCs after 0.313 μg/mL travoprost treatment (p≤0.039), while NF-κB and ADH7 protein levels decreased significantly in LSCs using 0.313 μg/mL travoprost (p=0.039; p<0.001).…”
-
2964
Western blot antibody information.
Published 2025“…<i>PTGFR</i> and <i>JNK</i> mRNA levels, MMP9 and ADH7 protein levels increased significantly in AN-LSCs after 0.313 μg/mL travoprost treatment (p≤0.039), while NF-κB and ADH7 protein levels decreased significantly in LSCs using 0.313 μg/mL travoprost (p=0.039; p<0.001).…”
-
2965
Information on healthy and aniridia subjects.
Published 2025“…<i>PTGFR</i> and <i>JNK</i> mRNA levels, MMP9 and ADH7 protein levels increased significantly in AN-LSCs after 0.313 μg/mL travoprost treatment (p≤0.039), while NF-κB and ADH7 protein levels decreased significantly in LSCs using 0.313 μg/mL travoprost (p=0.039; p<0.001).…”
-
2966
qPCR primers information.
Published 2025“…<i>PTGFR</i> and <i>JNK</i> mRNA levels, MMP9 and ADH7 protein levels increased significantly in AN-LSCs after 0.313 μg/mL travoprost treatment (p≤0.039), while NF-κB and ADH7 protein levels decreased significantly in LSCs using 0.313 μg/mL travoprost (p=0.039; p<0.001).…”
-
2967
-
2968
LNd stimulate LPN to form a circadian feedback circuit.
Published 2024“…Data (D) were quantified with unpaired <i>t</i> test. Data (G, I) were analyzed using Welch’s one-way ANOVA. ns = not significant, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001. …”
-
2969
Overall model framework.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2970
Key parameters of LSTM training model.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2971
Comparison chart of model evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2972
Model performance evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2973
The result compared with other existing methods.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
2974
NPF-NPFR pathway in LNd-LPN feedback circuit fine-tune cooling induced locomotion increase.
Published 2024“…Data (G, J, M, P) were analyzed with Welch’s one-way ANOVA (letters a, b denote significance, <i>P</i> < 0.05). Data (F, I, L, O) were quantified with paired <i>t</i> test. …”
-
2975
Disruption of OGG1-RNA interaction reduces RSV progeny production.
Published 2024“…Statistical analysis was conducted using an unpaired Student’s <i>t</i> test, with results shown as means ± SD. Significance levels are indicated as **<i>p</i> < 0.01, ***<i>p</i> < 0.001.…”
-
2976
Excel raw data.
Published 2025“…The effectiveness of currently available antimicrobial is decreasing due to the increasing prevalence of resistant strains among bacterial isolates. …”
-
2977
Fig S1.
Published 2025“…Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 4 per group). Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired t-test. …”
-
2978
Effect of inhibitors on the growth of <i>P. falciparum</i> and <i>P. berghei</i> blood stage parasites.
Published 2025“…The number of schizonts significantly decreased in the jasplankinolide (****P < 0.0001; one-way ANOVA)- and CK-666 (***P = 0.003; unpaired Student’s t test)-treated groups. …”
-
2979
AC-LPN circuit control high temperature induced increase of evening sleep.
Published 2024“…Data (G) were quantified with unpaired <i>t</i> test. ns = not significant, *<i>P</i> < 0.05, **<i>P</i> < 0.01, ***<i>P</i> < 0.001, ****<i>P</i> < 0.0001. …”
-
2980
The circadian LPN promote sleep through AstC pathway.
Published 2024“…(H, I) Thermogenetic inhibition of LPNs with Shibire<sup>TS</sup> (<i>LPN-spGal4>Shib</i><sup><i>TS</i></sup>; red line) leads to a significant decrease in sleep relative to baseline. …”