Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance tests » significance test (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance set (Expand Search)
tests decrease » costs decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significance tests » significance test (Expand Search), significance testing (Expand Search), significance set (Expand Search)
tests decrease » costs decreased (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
-
341
-
342
-
343
-
344
-
345
-
346
-
347
-
348
-
349
-
350
-
351
-
352
-
353
-
354
-
355
-
356
-
357
-
358
Testing set error.
Published 2025“…Further integration of Spearman correlation analysis and PCA dimensionality reduction created multidimensional feature sets, revealing substantial accuracy improvements: The BiLSTM model achieved an 83.6% cumulative MAE reduction from 1.65 (raw data) to 0.27 (STL-PCA), while traditional models like Prophet showed an 82.2% MAE decrease after feature engineering optimization. Finally, the Beluga Whale Optimization (BWO)-tuned STL-PCA-BWO-BiLSTM hybrid model delivered optimal performance on test sets (RMSE = 0.22, MAE = 0.16, MAPE = 0.99%, ), exhibiting 40.7% higher accuracy than unoptimized BiLSTM (MAE = 0.27). …”
-
359
-
360
qRT-PCR results of differentially expressed miRNAs in rats’ myocardial tissue after training.
Published 2025Subjects: