Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
17 decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
3521
-
3522
-
3523
-
3524
Ambient Air Pollutant Dynamics (2010–2025) and the Exceptional Winter 2016–17 Pollution Episode: Implications for a Uranium/Arsenic Exposure Event
Published 2025“…Accompanying plots show 28-day running averages, and a table compares winter pollutant burdens (2015/16–2018/19), highlighting the extreme Winter 2016/17 episode and its potential link to a documented urinary U/As spike between March and May 2017.…”
-
3525
-
3526
-
3527
GRADE judgements.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3528
Basic characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3529
The data of meta-analysis.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3530
Risk of bias.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3531
Overall risk of bias assessment.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3532
Funnel plot of VO<sub>2Peak</sub> inclusion studies.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3533
Analysis of subgroups.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the change in resting heart rate (RHR) (MD = 2.04, 95% CI: −2.71–6.78; P = 0.40) between the physical activity group and the control group, but there was a significant difference in the change in maximum heart rate (HR-max) (MD = 6.27, 95% CI: 1.75–10.97, P = 0.007). …”
-
3534
-
3535
-
3536
-
3537
-
3538
-
3539
-
3540