Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
121
Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels.
Published 2025“…Cohesiveness varied without a clear linear trend, showing significant changes at specific IDDSI levels for meats, grains, and tubers (<i>p</i>≤0.05). …”
-
122
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
123
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
124
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
125
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
126
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
127
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
128
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
129
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
130
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
-
131
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
132
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
133
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
134
Characteristics of the study population.
Published 2024“…MASLD was detected in 62 (4.8%) adolescents. CAP value showed a significant association with cfPWV in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) but lost its significant influence in the multivariable model after adjusting for sex, age and cardiovascular risk criteria (increased BMI or waist circumference, impaired glucose metabolism, elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol; p = 0.540). …”
-
135
Study flow chart.
Published 2024“…MASLD was detected in 62 (4.8%) adolescents. CAP value showed a significant association with cfPWV in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) but lost its significant influence in the multivariable model after adjusting for sex, age and cardiovascular risk criteria (increased BMI or waist circumference, impaired glucose metabolism, elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol; p = 0.540). …”
-
136
-
137
-
138
-
139
-
140
Subgroup analysis of AIP and depression.
Published 2025“…When AIP > 0.60, premenopausal women had an increased risk of depression, while postmenopausal women had a decreased risk of depression.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study demonstrates that elevated AIP levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of depression in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. …”