Showing 121 - 140 results of 1,050 for search '(( significant decrease decrease ) OR ( significant ((a decrease) OR (linear decrease)) ))~', query time: 0.34s Refine Results
  1. 121

    Relationships between hardness and IDDSI levels. by Muxi Chen (9294270)

    Published 2025
    “…Cohesiveness varied without a clear linear trend, showing significant changes at specific IDDSI levels for meats, grains, and tubers (<i>p</i>≤0.05). …”
  2. 122

    BMI groups by SES. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  3. 123

    BMISES_Data_Part2. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  4. 124

    Logistic regression for LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  5. 125

    Logistic regression for HSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  6. 126

    Logistic regression for overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  7. 127

    BMISES_Data_Part1. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  8. 128

    Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  9. 129

    Baseline characteristics of overall population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  10. 130

    Diagram of study population. by Krystal Hunter (6820052)

    Published 2025
    “…BMI was a significant factor in PTB for lower socioeconomic status (LSES) women. …”
  11. 131

    Study-related adverse events. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  12. 132

    Study flow chart. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  13. 133

    Study CONSORT diagram. by Benjamin R. Lewis (22279166)

    Published 2025
    “…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
  14. 134

    Characteristics of the study population. by Johannes Nairz (18010746)

    Published 2024
    “…MASLD was detected in 62 (4.8%) adolescents. CAP value showed a significant association with cfPWV in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) but lost its significant influence in the multivariable model after adjusting for sex, age and cardiovascular risk criteria (increased BMI or waist circumference, impaired glucose metabolism, elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol; p = 0.540). …”
  15. 135

    Study flow chart. by Johannes Nairz (18010746)

    Published 2024
    “…MASLD was detected in 62 (4.8%) adolescents. CAP value showed a significant association with cfPWV in the unadjusted model (p < 0.001) but lost its significant influence in the multivariable model after adjusting for sex, age and cardiovascular risk criteria (increased BMI or waist circumference, impaired glucose metabolism, elevated blood pressure, elevated plasma triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol; p = 0.540). …”
  16. 136
  17. 137
  18. 138
  19. 139
  20. 140

    Subgroup analysis of AIP and depression. by Siyi Deng (12887198)

    Published 2025
    “…When AIP > 0.60, premenopausal women had an increased risk of depression, while postmenopausal women had a decreased risk of depression.</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>This study demonstrates that elevated AIP levels are significantly associated with an increased risk of depression in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. …”