Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
3581
-
3582
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3583
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3584
-
3585
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3586
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3587
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3588
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3589
This file includes a supplementary figure relevant to the main body of the manuscript.
Published 2024Subjects: -
3590
-
3591
-
3592
(A) The distribution of mutations within the 3D structure of the TP53 protein.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3593
Estimated marginal mean (± SE) age group differences in the relative frequency of releases per minute, performed by professional soccer players on a match day for each position.
Published 2025Subjects: “…tailed statistical significance…”
-
3594
A) Calcium carbonate crystal size versus ferric ion concentration; B) SEM image at ferric ion concentration of 0.03 M; C) Ferric hydroxide colloid.
Published 2025Subjects: “…permeability coefficients decreased…”
-
3595
-
3596
-
3597
Data Sheet 1_Ribosomal protein L9 is a potential therapeutic target for B-ALL through the activation of the p53 signaling pathway.docx
Published 2025“…In this study, we observed a significant upregulation of RPL9 in human B-ALL cells compared to normal B cells, suggesting RPL9’s potential key role in B-ALL progression. …”
-
3598
Table 2_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”
-
3599
Table 1_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”
-
3600
Table 3_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”