Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search), awd decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
681
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
682
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
683
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
684
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
685
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
686
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
687
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…When are individuals more likely to support equal treatment algorithms (ETAs), characterized by higher predictive accuracy, and when do they prefer equal impact algorithms (EIAs) that reduce performance gaps between groups? A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
688
Blood Pressure and LDL-C During Follow-up.
Published 2025“…This post-hoc analysis included all patients aged ≥80 years (n = 394). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. …”
-
689
Baseline Characteristics of Included Patients.
Published 2025“…This post-hoc analysis included all patients aged ≥80 years (n = 394). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke. …”
-
690
Characteristics of the included studies.
Published 2025“…This study aimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of NPWT on SWI compared to conventional wound care through meta-analysis.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 29, 2024 for all potential studies. …”
-
691
Extracted data and used for analysis.
Published 2025“…This study aimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of NPWT on SWI compared to conventional wound care through meta-analysis.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 29, 2024 for all potential studies. …”
-
692
Excluded studies with reasons for exclusion.
Published 2025“…This study aimed to systematically evaluate the therapeutic effects of NPWT on SWI compared to conventional wound care through meta-analysis.</p><p>Methods</p><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted from inception to April 29, 2024 for all potential studies. …”
-
693
Prevaelnce of different pathogens by location.
Published 2025“…This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of NTS, STEC, and CAMPY simultaneously across all age groups and diverse regions in Ethiopia, revealing significant variations. …”
-
694
<i>Oenocarpus bacaba</i> palm tree (A) and fruit (B).
Published 2024“…Serological cure was achieved in 34.6% of cases, and IgG titers decreased in 15.3%.</p><p>Conclusions and significance</p><p>We encountered several barriers in managing ACD, including population vulnerability, reliance on outdated diagnostic techniques, lack of standardized molecular biology methods, and limited therapeutic options. …”
-
695
Data Sheet 1_Ribosomal protein L9 is a potential therapeutic target for B-ALL through the activation of the p53 signaling pathway.docx
Published 2025“…In this study, we observed a significant upregulation of RPL9 in human B-ALL cells compared to normal B cells, suggesting RPL9’s potential key role in B-ALL progression. …”
-
696
Table 2_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”
-
697
Table 1_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”
-
698
Table 3_To MRAs treatment or not? evidence from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of different MRAs on cardiovascular health in heart failure.docx
Published 2025“…Compared to conventional therapy or placebo, treatment with MRAs significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 0.862, 95% CI: 0.778–0.956, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 36.1%), cardiovascular mortality (RR = 0.828, 95% CI: 0.732–0.937, p = 0.003; I<sup>2</sup> = 45.7%), and heart failure-related hospitalization (RR = 0.780, 95% CI: 0.657–0.926, p = 0.005; I<sup>2</sup> = 65.5%). …”
-
699
Table 1_The association between oxidative balance scores and all-cause mortality and cancer-specific mortality in cancer survivors: a retrospective cohort study.doc
Published 2025“…</p>Conclusion<p>The study reveals a significant linear negative association between OBS in cancer survivors and both all-cause and cancer-specific mortality.…”
-
700
Fig 3 -
Published 2025“…For MFHA durations, CVH exhibits significant concomitant ‘shifting’ of ANS activity between IM- and LF-band during CVH intervention: LF-band duration increases by the amount that IM-band decreases. …”