Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
The results of linear mixed model.
Published 2024“…The tDCS group demonstrated a significant decrease in AMT of MF and TrA/IO muscles (P < 0.05) and an increase in N80 amplitude (P = 0.027), with no significant changes in the control group. …”
-
3
Sensory-evoked potentials of N80 and N150.
Published 2024“…The tDCS group demonstrated a significant decrease in AMT of MF and TrA/IO muscles (P < 0.05) and an increase in N80 amplitude (P = 0.027), with no significant changes in the control group. …”
-
4
-
5
BMI groups by SES.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
6
BMISES_Data_Part2.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
7
Logistic regression for LSES population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
8
Logistic regression for HSES population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
9
Logistic regression for overall population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
10
BMISES_Data_Part1.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
11
Baseline characteristics of HSES/LSES population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
12
Baseline characteristics of overall population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
13
Diagram of study population.
Published 2025“…Those who were LSES also had a curved relationship with PTB indicating that the as BMI increases, the odds of PTB decreases up until a BMI value, then the PTB rate increases. …”
-
14
S1 Data -
Published 2024“…However, when cortisol increases with one unit, the average concentration of prolactin decreases by 1.16 ng/ml (p = 0.013).…”
-
15
Characteristic of study population.
Published 2024“…However, when cortisol increases with one unit, the average concentration of prolactin decreases by 1.16 ng/ml (p = 0.013).…”
-
16
Univariate analyses.
Published 2025“…ED utilization by individuals with psychotic disorders increased during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, while ED use by most Canadians decreased. …”
-
17
Overview of individuals in the study.
Published 2025“…ED utilization by individuals with psychotic disorders increased during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, while ED use by most Canadians decreased. …”
-
18
Multivariate analyses.
Published 2025“…ED utilization by individuals with psychotic disorders increased during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, while ED use by most Canadians decreased. …”
-
19
Flowchart of participants in this study.
Published 2025“…This trend was also observed in participants with UACR levels below 30, where for every 10-unit increase in UACR, cognitive scores decreased by 0.013 (β = -0.013, 95% CI: -0.027 to -0.001; <i>P</i> < 0.05), and the odds of cognitive impairment increased by 1.4% (OR = 1.014, 95% CI: 1.003 to 1.038; <i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
20