Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
based decrease » caused decreased (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search), based defense (Expand Search)
-
201
Mean parameter values for the selected crops.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
202
Performance comparison of ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
203
Comparative data of different soil samples.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
204
Confusion matrix of random forest model.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
205
Sensor value scenario for fuzzy logic algorithm.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
206
Evaluation metrics of selected ML models.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
207
Block diagram of the proposed system.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
208
Chart for applicable amount of fertilizers.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
209
Cost analysis of irrigation controller unit.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
210
Run times of two algorithms.
Published 2025“…Furthermore, crop yield is predicted using Linear Regression and Random Forest, achieving accuracies of 93.49% and 95.87%, respectively, while using RMSE (Root Mean Squared Error) as the loss function. …”
-
211
Flowchart of the study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
212
Characteristics of study population.
Published 2025“…Among those 803 individuals who did not take antihypertensive medication, there was a significant association in linear regression between increase in PSS-10 and decrease in C2 (B: −0.2, 95% CI: −0.4- −0.02; p = 0.03) that was lost after adjustment for physical activity (B: −0.16, 95% CI: −0.35–0.03; p = 0.1). …”
-
213
Scores vs Skip ratios on single-agent task.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
214
Time(s) and GFLOPs savings of single-agent tasks.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
215
The source code of LazyAct.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
216
Win rate vs Skip ratios on multi-agents tasks.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
217
Single agent and multi-agents tasks for <i>LazyAct</i>.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
218
Network architectures for multi-agents task.
Published 2025“…The inferences reduction significantly decreases the time and FLOPs required by the <i>LazyAct</i> algorithm to complete tasks. …”
-
219
-
220