Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » scores decreased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
bias decrease » bias increases (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Concurrent mixed methods design diagram.
Published 2025“…It is hypothesised that: a) intervention sites will demonstrate more significant decreases in restrictive practice events and duration and physical injuries, compared to within-group baseline and control group, and b) measures of people’s experiences and perceptions and nurses’ outcomes and behaviours will improve, compared to within-group baseline. …”
-
6
The guiding map.
Published 2025“…It is hypothesised that: a) intervention sites will demonstrate more significant decreases in restrictive practice events and duration and physical injuries, compared to within-group baseline and control group, and b) measures of people’s experiences and perceptions and nurses’ outcomes and behaviours will improve, compared to within-group baseline. …”
-
7
-
8
List of captured wild pollinator species.
Published 2025“…Seed weight (farmer’s highest economic value) increased in conserved landscapes where wild pollinators prevailed, and with overall pollinator abundance; however, it decreased with male-to-female ratio, likely due to seed number-size trade-offs. …”
-
9
Map of the 20 study orchards.
Published 2025“…Seed weight (farmer’s highest economic value) increased in conserved landscapes where wild pollinators prevailed, and with overall pollinator abundance; however, it decreased with male-to-female ratio, likely due to seed number-size trade-offs. …”
-
10
Pictures of carob tree flowers and orchard.
Published 2025“…Seed weight (farmer’s highest economic value) increased in conserved landscapes where wild pollinators prevailed, and with overall pollinator abundance; however, it decreased with male-to-female ratio, likely due to seed number-size trade-offs. …”
-
11
-
12
Bias risk assessment of included studies.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
13
Genetic and structural factors contributing to the dominance and persistence of goose astrovirus type 2
Published 2025“…<p>Goose astrovirus (GoAstV) has emerged as a significant pathogen affecting the goose industry in China, with GoAstV-2 becoming the dominant genotype since 2017. …”
-
14
Included studies basic characteristics.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
15
Forest plot for FVC.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
16
All data extracted.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
17
Forest plot for TNF-
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
18
Forest plot for hs-CRP.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
19
Forest plot for IL-6.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
20
The incidence rate of adverse reactions.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”