Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), clinical areas (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), clinical areas (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
3561
The computed weighted sum of type I (dark gray) and type II (light gray) errors (
Published 2025Subjects: -
3562
-
3563
-
3564
Predicted probability of infection symptoms due to forest cover for 2011 and 2016.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3565
-
3566
-
3567
-
3568
-
3569
-
3570
Univariate and Multivariate analysis of risk factors for nerve injury 90-days after TKA.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3571
The computed weighted sum of type I (dark gray) and type II (light gray) errors (
Published 2025Subjects: -
3572
-
3573
-
3574
-
3575
-
3576
-
3577
-
3578
Pseudocode of the simulation program (see Supplementary Materials for <i>R</i> codes S1 File).
Published 2025Subjects: -
3579
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
3580
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”