Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
degrees decrease » degree increased (Expand Search)
age increased » rate increased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
degrees decrease » degree increased (Expand Search)
age increased » rate increased (Expand Search), use increased (Expand Search), cases increased (Expand Search)
-
21001
Forest plot for IL-6.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21002
Antibodies used for flow cytometry.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Flow cytometry analysis revealed a significantly higher apoptosis rate in AN-LSCs compared to LSCs (p < 0.0001). …”
-
21003
The incidence rate of adverse reactions.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21004
The PRISMA study flowchart.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21005
Forest plot for FEV1/FVC.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21006
Primer pairs used for qPCR.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>Flow cytometry analysis revealed a significantly higher apoptosis rate in AN-LSCs compared to LSCs (p < 0.0001). …”
-
21007
Forest plot for clinical efficacy.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21008
Forest plot for FEV1.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21009
The excluded and included studies were listed.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21010
Forest plot for PaCO<sub>2</sub>.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21011
Forest plot for PaO<sub>2</sub>.
Published 2025“…Compared to standard treatment, QJHTD significantly improved pulmonary function, with increases in FEV1 (MD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.25, 0.38], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FVC (MD = 0.30, 95% CI [0.22, 0.37], <i>p </i>= 0.000), FEV1/FVC (MD = 5.58, 95% CI [4.81, 6.34], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and PaO<sub>2</sub> (MD = 9.62, 95% CI [6.17, 13.08], <i>p </i>= 0.000), and a decrease in PaCO<sub>2</sub> (MD = -9.12, 95% CI [–11.96, –6.28], <i>p </i>= 0.000). …”
-
21012
Table 1_Machine learning prediction of depression in culturally diverse families: Findings from the Korea Community Health Survey.docx
Published 2025“…Background<p>Although South Korea's overall population is declining, the number of culturally diverse families is increasing. Depression in these families is a significant factor contributing to rising social costs and hindering social integration.…”
-
21013
Table 2_Machine learning prediction of depression in culturally diverse families: Findings from the Korea Community Health Survey.docx
Published 2025“…Background<p>Although South Korea's overall population is declining, the number of culturally diverse families is increasing. Depression in these families is a significant factor contributing to rising social costs and hindering social integration.…”
-
21014
Table 1_Relationship between the laboratory test-based frailty index and overall mortality in critically ill patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study based on the MI...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>The study included a total of 741 patients (all age ≥ 18 years, 19.84% age > 75 years, 41.16% Female). …”
-
21015
Data Sheet 2_Chronic pain in the Chilean population: risk factors prevalence and cognitive associations.pdf
Published 2025“…Female participants consistently reported higher CP rates, with significantly higher prevalence than males across age groups 15–64 years. …”
-
21016
Data Sheet 1_Chronic pain in the Chilean population: risk factors prevalence and cognitive associations.pdf
Published 2025“…Female participants consistently reported higher CP rates, with significantly higher prevalence than males across age groups 15–64 years. …”
-
21017
Data Sheet 1_Prevalence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in cattle in central and Western Inner Mongolia, China.docx
Published 2025“…In older animals, there was a significant decline in infection rates with increasing age. …”
-
21018
Supplementary Material for: Predictors for Upgrade to Breast Cancer in Patients with B3 Lesions Diagnosed by Core Biopsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Published 2024“…In univariate analysis, age, mammographic findings, histopathological type, and atypia in core biopsy were identified as significant factors affecting the upgrade rate (p=0.046, p=0.028, p<0.001, and p<0.001, respectively). …”
-
21019
Supplementary Material for: Management of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Pregnancy - A Systematic Review of a Multidisciplinary Challenge
Published 2025“…The global incidence of early-onset colorectal cancer (EO-CRC) has increased significantly, with CRC projected to be the leading cause of cancer-related deaths among individuals aged 20-49 by 2030. …”
-
21020
Sun peng state.sav
Published 2024“…At age 5, the surface caries in the high-risk children (dmf3–4s and dmf5–6s) in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (p < 0.05). …”