Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects regress (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects regress (Expand Search)
-
1941
-
1942
-
1943
-
1944
-
1945
-
1946
-
1947
-
1948
-
1949
-
1950
-
1951
-
1952
-
1953
-
1954
-
1955
-
1956
-
1957
-
1958
-
1959
PRISMA flow chart of the screening process.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”
-
1960
Forest plot of liver function tests.
Published 2025“…The analysis showed that pulsatile perfusion led to a significant decrease in creatinine level [MD = −0.14, 95% CI (−0.24, −.04), P < 0.004], lactate level [MD = −8.21, 95% CI (−13.16, −3.25), P < 0.001], hospital stay [MD = −1.38, 95% CI (−2.51, −0.25), P = 0.016], ICU stay [MD = −0.47, 95% CI (−0.82, −0.13), P = 0.007], intubation time [MD = −3.73, 95% CI (−5.42, −2.04), P < 0.001], and increase in creatinine clearance [MD = 10.08, 95% CI (3.36, 16.80), P < 0.003]. …”