Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
event decrease » cement decreases (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), levels decreased (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
-
2141
-
2142
-
2143
-
2144
-
2145
-
2146
-
2147
-
2148
-
2149
-
2150
-
2151
-
2152
-
2153
-
2154
-
2155
-
2156
CONSORT diagram.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2157
Raw data.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2158
Postoperative outcomes.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2159
Postoperative complications.
Published 2024“…The overall proportion of patients who experienced any adverse events was 57.8% in the GDFT group and 70.1% in the conventional group (P = 0.038), of which the occurrence of pleural effusion was significantly lower in the GDFT group than in the conventional group (9.5% vs. 19.7%; P = 0.024). …”
-
2160