Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
gender decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2981
-
2982
-
2983
-
2984
-
2985
Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2986
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2987
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2988
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2989
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2990
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2991
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2992
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2993
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2994
-
2995
Experimental design of this study.
Published 2024“…For example, several empirical and theoretical studies have demonstrated that older males make greater investment in reproduction compared with younger males. …”
-
2996
All relevant data of this study.
Published 2024“…For example, several empirical and theoretical studies have demonstrated that older males make greater investment in reproduction compared with younger males. …”
-
2997
-
2998
-
2999
Loss of MALS-1 function suppresses the mitochondrial and axon degeneration phenotypes that are caused by loss of RBM-26 function.
Published 2024“…Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference relative to wild type, Student’s <i>t</i> test (*<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
3000