Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
gender decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
2601
Comparison of the fit of multiple cluster analyses of the cross-lagged panel model.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2602
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2603
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2604
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2605
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2606
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2607
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2608
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2609
Preference for the EIA vs. ETA across scenarios.
Published 2025“…Additionally, preferences polarized along partisan identities, with Democrats favoring impact parity over accuracy maximization while Republicans displayed the reverse preference. Gender and social justice orientations also significantly predicted EIA support. …”
-
2610
-
2611
-
2612
-
2613
Loss of MALS-1 function suppresses the mitochondrial and axon degeneration phenotypes that are caused by loss of RBM-26 function.
Published 2024“…Asterisks indicate statistically significant difference relative to wild type, Student’s <i>t</i> test (*<i>p</i> < 0.05). …”
-
2614
-
2615
Overexpression of MALS-1 reduces mitochondria in the PLM axon and causes axon degeneration and axon overlap defects.
Published 2024“…Asterisks in panels D and E indicate statistically significant difference relative to wild type, Z-test for proportions (***<i>p</i> < 0.0001). …”
-
2616
-
2617
-
2618
-
2619
-
2620